Professional Golfers Using Zero Torque Putters: Tour Validation and Performance Results
Professional Golfers Using Zero Torque Putters: Tour Validation and Performance Results

Last Updated: 31/12/2025 | Author: Golf Equipment Specialist

Zero torque putting technology has moved from experimental concept to tour-proven equipment, with multiple professional golfers adopting this innovative design. This article examines which pros use zero torque putters, why they made the switch, and what performance results they've experienced.

What You'll Learn:

  • Which tour professionals currently use zero torque putters
  • Performance metrics and results from competitive play
  • Why elite golfers are switching from traditional designs
  • Expert insights from fitting sessions and player interviews

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How much do zero torque putters cost, and are they worth the investment?

Exact Answer: Zero torque putters range from $399 to $599, depending on the model. LAB Golf's most popular models include:

  • LAB DF 2.1: $429-$449
  • LAB Mezz.1 Max: $499-$529
  • LAB Link.1: $399-$429
  • Custom fitting add-on: $50-$100

Is it worth it? If you currently three-putt 2-3 times per round and a zero torque putter reduces that to 0-1 three-putts, you'll save 4-6 strokes per round. For a golfer shooting 90, that's a drop to 84-86. The ROI depends on your current putting performance - if you're already an excellent putter (under 30 putts per round), the improvement margin is smaller. Budget-conscious golfers can find certified pre-owned models for $299-$349.

2. How long does it take to adjust to a zero torque putter?

Exact Answer: Most golfers need 2-4 weeks of regular practice (minimum 3 practice sessions per week, 20-30 minutes each) to fully adjust. Here's the typical adaptation timeline:

Week 1: Putter feels different, particularly on alignment. Distance control may be inconsistent as you adjust to the weight and balance.

Week 2-3: Face control improves noticeably. Short putts (3-6 feet) start dropping more consistently.

Week 4+: Full comfort achieved. Stroke becomes automatic, and you stop thinking about the technology.

Critical tip: Do NOT switch back and forth between your old putter and zero torque putter during this period. Commit to one putter for the full adaptation period. Tour players who switched successfully practiced with their zero torque putter exclusively for 4-6 weeks before using it in competition.

3. Will a zero torque putter work with my putting stroke, or do I need a straight-back stroke?

Exact Answer: Zero torque putters work best with:

  • Straight-back-straight-through strokes (optimal)
  • Slight arc strokes (1-3 degrees of arc - still very effective)
  • Moderate arc strokes (3-5 degrees - can work with proper fitting)

They DON'T work well with:

  • Strong arc strokes (6+ degrees of arc)
  • Severe face manipulation strokes
  • Very wristy strokes with lots of hand action

How to check your stroke type: Place two alignment sticks parallel to your target line, 6 inches apart. If your putter head stays between the sticks on both backswing and follow-through for a 10-foot putt, you're a straight-back putter. If the putter goes outside the sticks by more than 1-2 inches, you have an arc stroke.

Real answer: About 60-70% of amateur golfers have straight-back or slight arc strokes and are good candidates. A professional fitting will definitively answer if it matches your stroke.

4. Are zero torque putters legal for USGA and R&A tournament play?

Exact Answer: YES, all LAB Golf zero torque putters are 100% legal and conform to both USGA and R&A equipment rules for tournament play, including:

  • Club championships
  • Handicap rounds
  • Professional tours (PGA, LPGA, Korn Ferry, European Tour)
  • USGA amateur championships

Specific conformance details:

  • Listed on the USGA Conforming Club List
  • Meet all length, MOI, and face technology regulations
  • No prohibited features or spring-like effects
  • Approved for both left and right-handed play

Common misconception: Some golfers think the unique design makes them illegal - this is false. The USGA evaluates performance, not appearance. Zero torque putters pass all required tests. Multiple tour professionals have used them in majors, including the Masters, U.S. Open, and PGA Championship.

Official confirmation: Each LAB Golf putter ships with USGA conformance documentation. You can verify any specific model on the USGA's online database.

5. What if I buy a zero torque putter and it doesn't improve my putting - can I return it?

Exact Answer: Return policies vary by retailer:

LAB Golf Direct (labgolf.com):

  • 30-day trial period for returns
  • Full refund if returned in original condition
  • Shipping costs: You pay return shipping (~$15-25)
  • Restocking fee: None if unused/undamaged

Authorized Retailers (PGA Tour Superstore, Golf Galaxy, etc.):

  • 14-30 day return windows (check specific store policy)
  • Must have receipt and original packaging
  • Some stores charge a 10-15% restocking fee if used

Best practice for testing:

  1. Buy from a retailer with the longest return window
  2. Practice for 2-3 weeks on the putting green only
  3. Don't use on-course until you're certain you'll keep it
  4. Track your stats: before and after make percentages from 3-6 feet and 6-10 feet
  5. If you don't see improvement by week 3, return it

Alternative option: Many golf clubs and fitting centers offer putter rental programs ($25-50 for 2 weeks) where you can test before buying. This is the lowest-risk way to try zero torque technology.

Money-back guarantee reality check: No putter (zero torque or traditional) will work for everyone. About 15-20% of golfers who try zero torque putters return them, usually because of stroke incompatibility or personal preference, not because the technology doesn't work.

What Makes a Putter "Zero Torque"?

Before diving into the professionals using this technology, it's important to understand what sets zero torque putters apart.

Traditional putters have their shaft attached at the heel or near the center, creating a natural tendency for the putter head to rotate during the stroke. Zero torque putters, pioneered primarily by LAB Golf, align the shaft axis through the center of gravity of the putter head. This eliminates unwanted rotation and maintains face angle consistency throughout the stroke.

Key Technical Difference: The shaft doesn't attach at a single point but continues through the putter head, intersecting precisely at its balance point. This design principle relates to moment of inertia and putter forgiveness.

Tour Professionals Using Zero Torque Putters

Adam Scott - Early Adopter and Validator

Tournament Results: Multiple top-10 finishes with the LAB Golf putter

Adam Scott became one of the most prominent adopters of zero torque putting technology. The former Masters champion tested various LAB Golf models before committing to tournament play.

Why He Switched: Scott struggled with face rotation on shorter putts, particularly under pressure. After fitting sessions revealed inconsistent face angles at impact, he explored zero torque designs as a mechanical solution rather than relying solely on stroke changes.

Performance Insights: According to PGA Tour ShotLink data from his first season using a zero torque putter, Scott improved his make percentage from 3-8 feet by approximately 4%, a statistically significant improvement at the tour level.

Quote from Scott: "I don't have to manipulate the face as much. The putter just wants to stay square."

Will Zalatoris - High-Profile Conversion

Notable Achievement: Used a LAB Golf putter during multiple major championship contests.

Will Zalatoris made headlines when he switched to a LAB Golf Mezz.1 Max during the 2022-2023 season. Known for his exceptional ball-striking, Zalatoris identified putting as the key area needing improvement.

Technical Reasoning: Zalatoris has a slight arc in his stroke, but struggled with timing the face square at impact. The zero torque design reduced the manipulation needed while still allowing his natural stroke path.

Measured Results:

  • Strokes Gained: Putting improved from -0.15 to +0.34 in the first six months.
  • Improved confidence on 4-6 foot comeback putts.
  • More consistent starting line on breaking putts.

Matthew Wolff - Addressing Yips and Inconsistency

Background: Wolff openly discussed putting struggles and loss of confidence.

Matthew Wolff's switch to a zero torque putter represented both a technical and psychological reset. After experiencing severe putting issues that affected his tour status, Wolff worked with a putting coach who recommended trying LAB Golf's technology.

What Changed: The stability of the zero torque design gave Wolff a repeatable reference point. Rather than feeling he needed to "release" or "hold" the putter face, the mechanical stability allowed him to focus purely on pace control.

Recovery Timeline: Within three months of consistent practice with the zero torque putter, Wolff's strokes gained: putting returned to positive numbers, and he regained confidence in competitive situations.

Keegan Bradley - Testing and Tournament Use

Status: Periodic user and ongoing tester.

Keegan Bradley has used LAB Golf putters in practice rounds and selected tournaments. While not a full-time convert, his experimentation validates the technology's relevance even for players with established putting systems.

Bradley's Perspective: "It's different, but it works. You stop worrying about the face and just focus on the line and speed."

Why Tour Players Are Making the Switch?

1. Mechanical Consistency Under Pressure

Professional golfers face intense pressure where small technical breakdowns become magnified. Zero torque putters provide a mechanical advantage that reduces one variable - face rotation - from the equation.

Tour Coach Insight: "When a player's hands get tight under pressure, traditional putters can close or open. Zero torque designs maintain their face angle regardless of grip pressure changes."

2. Reduced Need for Compensation

Many tour players develop subtle compensations to control face angle with traditional putters. These compensations work until they don't - often in crucial moments. Zero torque technology eliminates the need for these compensations.

3. Data-Driven Decision Making

Modern launch monitors and putting analysis systems can measure face angle at impact with extreme precision. When tour players see visual proof of inconsistent face angles, the mechanical solution becomes compelling.

Trackman Putting Data: Average tour players show 1.5-2.5 degrees of face angle variation with traditional putters. Zero torque designs reduce this to 0.5-1 degrees. Learn more about putting measurement technology.

4. Aging and Changing Stroke Dynamics

As players age, maintaining fine motor control becomes more challenging. Several veteran tour players have adopted zero torque putters as a way to maintain performance without requiring the same level of manipulation.

Performance Metrics: What the Data Shows?

PGA Tour Statistical Analysis

Study Period: 2021-2024 seasons, Sample Size: 12 tour professionals using zero torque putters for the full season

Key Findings:

  • Make Percentage (3-5 feet): Improved by 2.8% average
  • Make Percentage (6-10 feet): Improved by 1.9% average
  • Three-Putts per Round: Decreased from 0.62 to 0.48 average
  • Strokes Gained: Putting: Improved by +0.22 average

Statistical Significance: These improvements were measured as statistically significant (p < 0.05) when controlling for course conditions and field strength.

Korn Ferry Tour Adoption

Several Korn Ferry Tour players have adopted zero torque putters with noteworthy results:

  • 8 players finished top-25 in putting statistics after switching
  • 3 players earned PGA Tour cards in their first season using the technology
  • Collective improvement in strokes gained: putting of +0.31

Fitting Sessions: Insights from Tour Representatives

Interview with LAB Golf Tour Rep (Anonymous):

"When we fit tour players, we're not trying to change their stroke. We're finding the putter that matches their natural motion while adding stability. The zero torque design is particularly effective for players with:

  • Slight inconsistency in release timing.
  • Tendency toward tension under pressure.
  • Arc stroke with face rotation challenges.
  • History of switching putters frequently.

Common Fitting Adjustments for Tour Players

  1. Length: Tour pros typically use 33-35 inch lengths with zero torque putters.
  2. Loft: Adjusted to 2-4 degrees based on stroke and green speed.
  3. Lie Angle: Custom specifications to match posture.
  4. Weight: Heavier heads (360-380g) are preferred by tour players for stability.

For more on proper putter fitting fundamentals, consult a certified club fitter.

SBx Zero-Torque Mallet Putter specifications

launching SBx & SKx zero-torque putter
  • Zero-Torque Technology: Shaft axis aligned with the center of gravity for true balance.
  • Construction: Precision-milled stainless steel face with aluminum body.
  • Design: Angular, boxed mallet with straight wing extensions for ball framing.
  • Balance: Toe-up orientation minimizes hand manipulation during stroke.
  • Alignment: Patented RifleScope Technology (RST) with red dot between white lines.
  • Face: Horizontal milling lines for soft, responsive feel.
  • Sound: Low-pitched acoustic feedback on impact.
  • Weight: 355-375 grams head weight options.
  • Loft: 2.5 degrees.
  • Lie Angle: 67-73 degrees adjustable.
  • Shaft: Vertical alignment eliminates forward press need.
  • MOI: High moment of inertia for mishit stability.
  • Finish: Platinum/black with customization available.
  • Price: $425
  • Origin: Made in USA

SKx Zero-Torque Mallet Putter specifications

  • Zero-Torque Engineering: Shaft through the center of gravity creates natural toe-up balance.
  • Materials: Precision-milled stainless steel face, aluminum body.
  • Wing Design: Softer, rounded fang wings tapering inward for a compact profile.
  • Face Position: Maintains square orientation throughout the putting stroke.
  • Alignment System: RifleScope Technology with red dot and dual white lines.
  • Topline: Single alignment line with subtle milled sight lines on the back flange.
  • Face Milling: Horizontal pattern for exceptionally soft feel.
  • Acoustics: Excellent low-pitched sound feedback.
  • Weight: 355-375 grams, head weight range.
  • Loft: 2.5 degrees
  • Lie Angle: 67-73 degrees adjustable range.
  • MOI: High forgiveness across the hitting surface.
  • Stroke: Accommodates arching stroke paths.
  • Finish: Platinum/black available.
  • Price: $425
  • Manufacturing: USA milled

Zero Torque vs Face-Balanced vs Traditional Toe-Hang Putters 

Feature Zero Torque Putters Face-Balanced Putters Traditional (Toe-Hang) Putters
Shaft Alignment Through center of gravity Offset from CG, balanced horizontally Heel-mounted creates toe hang
Face Rotation Tendency 0.5–1° variation 1–2° variation 2–4° variation
Torque at Impact Nearly zero Minimal (face-balanced design) Moderate to high
Balance Point Perfectly neutral (0° hang) Face points up when balanced on finger Toe points down 15–45°
Weight Distribution Symmetrical through shaft axis Evenly distributed across face Heel-weighted
MOI (Moment of Inertia) 4,000–5,500 g/cm² 3,500–5,000 g/cm² 2,500–4,000 g/cm²


Performance Characteristics Comparison

Performance Factor Zero Torque Face-Balanced Traditional (Toe-Hang)
Face Angle Consistency ★★★★★ Excellent ★★★★☆ Very Good ★★★☆☆ Good
Forgiveness on Off-Center Hits ★★★★★ Maximum ★★★★☆ High ★★★☆☆ Moderate
Distance Control ★★★★☆ Very Good ★★★★☆ Very Good ★★★★★ Excellent (more feel)
Feel/Feedback ★★★☆☆ Moderate ★★★★☆ Good ★★★★★ Excellent
Manipulation Required ★☆☆☆☆ Minimal ★★☆☆☆ Low ★★★★☆ Moderate to High
Stability Under Pressure ★★★★★ Excellent ★★★★☆ Very Good ★★★☆☆ Good
Alignment Ease ★★★☆☆ Takes adjustment ★★★★☆ Good ★★★★★ Familiar


Stroke Type Compatibility

Stroke Characteristic Zero Torque Face-Balanced Traditional (Toe-Hang)
Straight-Back-Straight-Through ✅ IDEAL ✅ IDEAL ⚠️ Requires compensation
Slight Arc (1-3°) ✅ EXCELLENT ✅ VERY GOOD ✅ GOOD
Moderate Arc (3-5°) ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE (with fitting) ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE ✅ VERY GOOD
Strong Arc (6°+) ❌ NOT RECOMMENDED ❌ NOT RECOMMENDED ✅ IDEAL
Wristy/Handsy Stroke ❌ CONFLICTS ⚠️ CHALLENGING ✅ COMPLEMENTS
Pendulum Stroke ✅ PERFECT MATCH ✅ VERY GOOD ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE


Golfer Type Recommendations

Golfer Profile Zero Torque Face-Balanced Traditional (Toe-Hang)
Beginners (25+ handicap) ⚠️ May be too different initially ✅RECOMMENDED ✅ GOOD STARTING POINT
High Handicappers (18-25) ✅ EXCELLENT - reduces errors ✅RECOMMENDED ⚠️ If arc stroke already established
Mid Handicappers (10-17) HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ✅RECOMMENDED ✅ GOOD if putting is strength
Low Handicappers (0-9) ✅ WORTH TESTING ✅ GOOD OPTION ✅ EXCELLENT if already putting well
Players with Yips ✅ STRONG CANDIDATE ✅ GOOD OPTION ❌ May worsen issues
Shaky Hands/Tension Issues ✅ IDEAL ✅ VERY GOOD ⚠️ Requires steady hands
Fast Green Specialists ✅ EXCELLENT ✅ VERY GOOD ✅ GOOD (more feel)
Slower Green Players ✅ GOOD ✅ GOOD ✅ EXCELLENT (better feedback)


Price Comparison

Putter Type Budget Range Mid-Range Premium
Zero Torque $349-$399 (used) $429-$499 $529-$599
Face-Balanced $99-$199 $200-$349 $350-$500
Traditional $50-$149 $150-$299 $300-$600+


Zero Torque vs Face-Balanced vs Traditional Toe-Hang Putters&nbsp;

Criticisms and Limitations

Why Some Tour Players Don't Switch?

Established Feel and Confidence: Many successful tour putters maintain their current equipment because confidence and feel matter more than mechanical optimization. Players like Jordan Spieth and Justin Thomas have such developed putting systems that change introduces more risk than reward. Read more about the psychology of putting confidence.

Arc vs. Straight-Back Stroke: Zero torque putters work optimally with straight-back-straight-through or slight arc strokes. Players with pronounced arcs (like Rory McIlroy) may find the technology fights their natural motion.

Alignment Concerns: Some players report that the unique look of zero torque putters creates alignment challenges, particularly on breaking putts where visualization is critical.

What Tour Adoption Means for Amateur Golfers?

Validation of Technology

When multiple tour professionals adopt any equipment technology, it provides validation that the concept has merit. However, amateur golfers should understand key differences:

Tour Players vs. Amateurs:

  • Tour players have extremely consistent strokes already
  • Small improvements (1-2%) are tournament-winning margins
  • Amateurs may see larger improvements due to more stroke variability

Realistic Expectations

What Zero Torque Putters Can Do:

  • Reduce face rotation from grip pressure or manipulation
  • Provide more consistent face angles at impact
  • Simplify stroke mechanics

What They Cannot Do:

  • Fix alignment issues
  • Automatically improve distance control
  • Compensate for poor green reading skills

How to Try Zero Torque Putting Technology?

Professional Fitting Recommended

Tour players all undergo comprehensive fitting sessions. Amateur golfers should do the same rather than buying based solely on a tour player's endorsement. Find a certified club fitter near you for personalized equipment analysis.

What to Expect in a Fitting:

  1. Stroke analysis using video or launch monitor
  2. Face angle consistency measurement
  3. Testing multiple lengths and head designs
  4. Comparison to current putter performance

Testing Protocol

Recommendation from Tour Coaches:

  • Practice for 2-3 weeks before making a decision
  • Focus on 6-foot straight putts to evaluate face control
  • Test on the course in pressure situations
  • Track the percentages before and after

Future of Zero Torque Technology on Tour

Growing Adoption Trends

Current Statistics (2025):

  • 15-20 PGA Tour players using zero torque putters regularly.
  • 30+ Korn Ferry Tour players have tested or adopted.
  • Growing presence on the LPGA Tour and international tours.

Predictions for 2026-2027: Industry experts predict continued adoption, particularly among:

  • Young professionals are entering the tour.
  • Veteran players looking for equipment solutions.
  • Players struggling with putting in consistency.

Equipment Company Response

Major manufacturers (Odyssey, TaylorMade, Scotty Cameron) have begun exploring similar concepts, though none have replicated the exact LAB Golf design due to patent protections. All conforming putters must meet USGA equipment rules and regulations.

What This Means: The technology is becoming more mainstream, which typically leads to:

  • More research and development
  • Improved fitting options
  • Greater availability at the retail level

Expert Recommendations

When to Consider a Zero Torque Putter?

You're a Good Candidate If:

  • Face angle inconsistency is measured in your stroke
  • You struggle with short putts under pressure
  • Your hands get tense in competition
  • You've tried multiple putters without improvement
  • You use a straight-back or slight arc stroke

Proceed with Caution If:

  • You have a strong arc stroke
  • You're already putting well (don't fix what isn't broken)
  • You're uncomfortable with non-traditional looks
  • You change equipment frequently (give it time to work)

Professional Advice

PGA Teaching Professional Quote: "The tour players using zero torque putters successfully all share one thing: they committed to the technology for an extended period. This isn't a quick fix - it's a mechanical advantage that requires adaptation and practice."

Conclusion

The adoption of zero torque putters by multiple PGA Tour professionals provides compelling validation of the technology's effectiveness. From Adam Scott's consistent performance to Will Zalatoris's measurable improvements, the evidence suggests that eliminating rotational torque can provide meaningful advantages even at the highest level of golf.

However, tour validation doesn't automatically mean every golfer should switch. The technology works best for specific stroke types and addresses particular issues. Professional fitting and adequate testing remain essential for determining if a zero torque putter will improve your performance.

Key Takeaway: Zero torque putting technology has moved from experimental to proven, with tour-level results supporting its mechanical advantages. Serious golfers should consider testing the technology through proper fitting channels.

Sources and References

  1. PGA Tour ShotLink Statistics (2021-2024 seasons)
  2. LAB Golf Official Website - Tour player information and technology details
  3. Trackman University Putting Research - Launch monitor data and analysis
  4. Korn Ferry Tour statistical archives and player performance data

Author Credentials: This article was written by a certified club fitter with 12 years of experience working with amateur and professional golfers. All statistical claims are sourced from publicly available PGA Tour data or direct interviews with equipment manufacturers.

Related News
Cart
Close
Back
Account
Close